Africa Institute for Energy Governance Hosts Contract Transparency Workshop
On November 6, the Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) hosted a training workshop in Kampala, Uganda to promote contract transparency in Uganda's oil sector. The training, sponsored by Revenue Watch with contributions from Publish What You Pay Uganda and the Open Society Initiative for East Africa, brought together a diverse set of actors, including civil society groups, members of parliament and journalists, to promote public disclosure of the country's oil contracts.
![]() |
|
Lake Albert, seen above from the Ugandan shore, falls within the Albertine Graben area where massive reserves of oil were discovered in 2006. |
In 2006 oil was found in Uganda's Albertine Graben, a sedimentary basin straddling the border between the nation and the Democratic Republic of Congo. This was the first discovery of oil in Uganda and is estimated to be the biggest onshore oil discovery in Sub-Saharan Africa in the past 20 years. Uganda has two billion barrels of confirmed oil reserves, of which over 800 million barrels are expected to be recoverable. The Ugandan government has signed a number of production sharing agreements (PSAs) with foreign oil companies as its exploitation plans progress. Unfortunately, these agreements have remained secret, despite provisions of the Ugandan Constitution and the 2005 Access to Information Act. With its training workshop, AFIEGO sought to build participants' understanding of the terms of these PSAs, the importance of contract transparency and the particular issues that arise in developing countries with newfound oil wealth.
Professor Peter Rosenblum of Columbia Law School was the principal facilitator of the workshop. Rosenblum's recent work has focused on the confluence of natural resources and human rights issues around the world, particularly emphasizing mining and oil contracts in Africa. He is also co-author, with Revenue Watch Institute Legal Fellow Susan Maples, of RWI's report Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries, released earlier this year.
In addition to contract transparency, the workshop also highlighted concerns about the lack of legal infrastructure to manage oil exploration, production and revenues. Rosenblum described the example of Chad, a country which he said demonstrates that it is much easier to extract and produce oil than it is to develop a legal and social infrastructure to manage the process.
In 2008, Uganda enacted an Oil and Gas Policy to govern its newly found resource. By all accounts the new policy creates good guidelines, but these have yet to be implemented. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development is said to be drafting an oil law now, but that process has remained closed to civil society input, and the law will not be made public until the Ministry submits it to parliament. Not even Winnie Masiko, Chairperson of the parliament's Natural Resources Committee, has seen the draft. In her keynote speech at the Revenue Watch workshop, Masiko echoed concerns about the country’s legal infrastructure, noting that parliament should enable civil society to have a role in the lawmaking process and in oversight of Uganda's oil production.
The workshop gave Revenue Watch an important opportunity to speak directly with MPs about the challenges they face managing resource production and revenues over the longer term to facilitate nationwide development. Revenue Watch hopes to support further capacity-building in this area, to ensure that MPs are equipped with the specialized tools necessary for effective oversight.
At the workshop, Nelly Busingye, an RWI-AFIEGO fellow, presented research on the relevance of contract transparency in the implementation of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI). To date, Uganda has neither signed on to become an EITI candidate, nor disclosed its contracts. Busingye's research compared case studies from Nigeria and Azerbaijan, and highlighted the important role of contract transparency in fostering the accountable governance of extractive resources. For a new oil state like Uganda, such lessons from other resource-rich countries are a valuable roadmap in developing an effective legal framework.
LEARN MORE
U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits - The New York Times
Australia Gas Deal Renews Tension - Financial Times
Charged With Fraud, Nigeria's Ruling Party Leader Resigns - Reuters
Western Senators Propose Ban on Pacific Drilling - The New York Times
To Limit Corruption around Mining in Africa, Follow the Money - The Globe and Mail
Court Backs Oil Project - The New York Times
Transparency Increases, But There Is Still a Long Way to Go - The Phnom Penh Post
IMF Develops Project to Help Africa Deal with Illicit Trade - African Manager
Three-day Conference on Africa's Natural Resources Starts in Tanzania - Standard Times Press
After Oil Rig Blast, BP Refused to Share Underwater Spill Footage - ABC News
Finger-Pointing, but Few Answers at Hearings on Drilling - The New York Times
Complaints Over U.N. Prize Sponsored by Equatorial Guinea's Obiang - Reuters
Guide: Community-Company Grievance Resolution for Australian Mining Industry - Oxfam Australia (pdf)
Cote D'Ivoire: President for Life, and Then Some - The New York Times
In Midst of Massive Spill, Oil Industry Fighting Transparency and Accountability - Oxfam America
Leaked Oil Contracts in DRC Threaten Resource Wars and $10 Billion Rip-Off by British Company - Carbon Web
Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries
Contract transparency is sorely needed to improve the management of natural resource wealth. In a new report from RWI, authors Peter Rosenblum and Susan Maples delve into government and private sector objections to contract disclosure and make conclusions about what information may legitimately and reasonably be kept confidential, and how civil society institutions can better confront the challenge of secret deals.
Learn more about the report ...
NEW TRANSLATION: Revenue Redistribution at the Local Level
Many resource-rich countries are attempting to compensate their producing regions through shares of resource revenues to be spent at the local level. In "Extractive Industries Revenues Distribution at the Sub-National Level," development economics consultant Matteo Morgandi presents a comparative analysis of international legislation for distribution of extractive revenues from across all levels of government. Prepared at the request of the Peruvian National Congress, the report studies the legislative practices of seven resource-rich countries to identify potential and address challenges. Please note that this report is now also available in Vietnamese.
Learn more ...

