UGANDA: Civil Society Engagement in the Ongoing Oil Exploration
Contributed by CAFE Fellows Sophie Kutegeka and Nelly Busingye
Oil exploration in Uganda is progressing rapidly, with numerous oil reserves being discovered, and more wells drilled in the Albertine region in the last two years. This rise in exploration raises expectations of an increase in the number of barrels of oil Uganda produces, from current estimated at 4,000 to 10,000 barrels per day. Three main companies are engaged in exploratory drilling, including Tullow Oil, Heritage Oil and Gas, and Tower Resources. In an effort to ensure transparent management of the oil revenues for the benefit of the entire country, Uganda’s government has begun to set up clear mechanisms for the management of oil revenues, including passing the National Oil and Gas policy in January 2008.
But with production due to start in 2009, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and other stakeholders are wary whether the mechanisms and institutions intended to promote transparency will actually benefit the public good, and so have developed a number of programs to ensure their full participation in overseeing the revenues. CSOs are coming together as a coalition to create a working relationship with both the government and oil companies to address the issue of revenue transparency and develop mechanisms to promote transparent oil governance.
These efforts include the leadership of Revenue Watch grantee the Africa Institute for Energy Governance’s (AFIEGO) in establishing the Publish What You Pay Coalition (PWYP) of Uganda, which was launched in October 2008 to coordinate and streamline the efforts of CSOs and citizens invested in promoting transparency and accountability in the oil sector. Also, a steering committee was formed for PWYP Uganda to develop an agenda for implementing the advocacy initiatives and a constitution to guide PWYP’s work.
In September, AFIEGO convened civil society groups participants from Uganda, DRC, Nigeria, and South Africa, among others countries, in a forum that concluded with a joint statement calling on the governments of Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to involve local communities and other interest groups in oil related negotiations.
Participants appealed to the two governments to quickly address emerging cross border conflicts triggered by the discovery of oil. AFIEGO Executive Director Dickens Kamugisha said the two governments “should be transparent and provide information to their citizens and allow them to participate in all national decision making processes as a way of avoiding conflicts.”
In partnership with a number of other CSOs, the Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE) is conducting comprehensive research on existing frameworks for revenue transparency to craft a revenue sharing mechanism for oil revenue. CSOs are also following up on a civil suit filed by the Human Rights Network (HURINET) and other parties which would compel the government to disclose to the public any Production Sharing Agreements made with oil companies.
There has also been a failure of concern on the part of oil companies and government agencies to prepare for and deal with the ecological impact of oil exploration. A civil society coalition led by ACODE publicly responded to the Environmental Impact Assessment published by Tullow Oil and circulated by the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) for public comments. The coalition’s comments raised significant public concern and drew responses from both from Tullow and NEMA. CSOs subsequently organized a meeting to discuss the environmental impact of oil exploration and exploitation that drew representatives of Tullow Oil Company and the Department of Petroleum Exploration (DPE). The meeting concluded with commitments from both Tullow and the DPE to consider civil society concerns on the environment.
Ugandan CSOs have gained the space to engage in transparency advocacy in the oil and gas sector, but CSOs, the government and oil companies are all challenged to maintain their partnership to ensure economy-wide benefits from oil revenues, including a fair share for oil-producing regions, and the promotion of general awareness of how oil revenues can contribute to sustainable development.
Read more about AFIEGO's work in Uganda ... (Green Grants)
U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits - The New York Times
Australia Gas Deal Renews Tension - Financial Times
Charged With Fraud, Nigeria's Ruling Party Leader Resigns - Reuters
Western Senators Propose Ban on Pacific Drilling - The New York Times
To Limit Corruption around Mining in Africa, Follow the Money - The Globe and Mail
Court Backs Oil Project - The New York Times
Transparency Increases, But There Is Still a Long Way to Go - The Phnom Penh Post
IMF Develops Project to Help Africa Deal with Illicit Trade - African Manager
Three-day Conference on Africa's Natural Resources Starts in Tanzania - Standard Times Press
After Oil Rig Blast, BP Refused to Share Underwater Spill Footage - ABC News
Finger-Pointing, but Few Answers at Hearings on Drilling - The New York Times
Complaints Over U.N. Prize Sponsored by Equatorial Guinea's Obiang - Reuters
Guide: Community-Company Grievance Resolution for Australian Mining Industry - Oxfam Australia (pdf)
Cote D'Ivoire: President for Life, and Then Some - The New York Times
In Midst of Massive Spill, Oil Industry Fighting Transparency and Accountability - Oxfam America
Leaked Oil Contracts in DRC Threaten Resource Wars and $10 Billion Rip-Off by British Company - Carbon Web
Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries
Contract transparency is sorely needed to improve the management of natural resource wealth. In a new report from RWI, authors Peter Rosenblum and Susan Maples delve into government and private sector objections to contract disclosure and make conclusions about what information may legitimately and reasonably be kept confidential, and how civil society institutions can better confront the challenge of secret deals.
Learn more about the report ...
NEW TRANSLATION: Revenue Redistribution at the Local Level
Many resource-rich countries are attempting to compensate their producing regions through shares of resource revenues to be spent at the local level. In "Extractive Industries Revenues Distribution at the Sub-National Level," development economics consultant Matteo Morgandi presents a comparative analysis of international legislation for distribution of extractive revenues from across all levels of government. Prepared at the request of the Peruvian National Congress, the report studies the legislative practices of seven resource-rich countries to identify potential and address challenges. Please note that this report is now also available in Vietnamese.
Learn more ...
