NEWS
September 4, 2009

COMMENTARY: To Succeed, an Iraqi National Oil Company Needs an Iraqi Oil Law

By Patrick Heller, Legal Analyst, RWI

  Patrick Heller

News from Iraq indicates that on July 28 the Cabinet agreed upon a bill establishing a new National Oil Company (NOC), to help develop the country's petroleum and ramp up production to meet the government's pressing revenue needs.  The details of the bill have not been released, but a strong commercial company with a clear mandate could be instrumental in the revitalization of Iraq's oil sector.

However, this enabling legislation cannot be a stand-alone action. A national company will be doomed to fail if it arrives unaccompanied by core laws to govern Iraq's oil sector. These long-debated laws continue to languish.

Since the fall of Saddam, Iraq's oil industry has been without a firm legal or institutional regime governing operation of the sector, revenue collection, or disbursements within the budget or across the country.  This vacuum of policy hobbles Iraq's prospects for stability, prosperity and investment in essential public programs. 

The hard costs of Iraq's absentee oil laws are many. The government has announced its hope of increasing production to 4 million barrels per day (from a level of about 2.4 million as of this June), but coherent plans for field development demand firm rules on regulatory policy, legislative oversight, and the obligations of private international companies. Meanwhile, the fractious and unresolved dispute over contracts signed between Kurdish authorities and foreign oil interests looms over the entire future of Iraqi oil.

Without an underlying legal regime, development risks skyrocket for private investors and for Iraq itself.  Divergent views on risk marred Iraq's bidding round for oil service contracts earlier this summer, when only one of the eight fields was successfully auctioned, due to a scarcity of bids and to proposals from risk-averse companies requiring compensation up to ten times higher than what Iraq was willing to pay.

Beyond the cloudy outlook for state revenue, the lack of a legal framework casts a long shadow over the potential for Iraqi citizens to benefit from the vast natural resource wealth beneath their feet. 

Arguments about revenue-sharing between the central government and the regions remain unresolved, and key decisions on budgeting, oversight and revenue reporting are likewise in legal limbo. The draft law that seeks to address several of these issues has been stuck in the national legislature since 2007.

An Iraqi National Oil Company would certainly play a major role in the ultimate success or failure of oil reform.  But as government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh noted in July, an NOC law and a broader legal framework for the sector are "all one package."

Like any private company, an NOC must be subject to regulatory and legislative review.  When NOCs operate as de facto regulators or policy-makers, the risks of corruption and inefficiency rise significantly.  The question of who in government will act as the primary agent for the NOC's public shareholders is particularly important in Iraq, given the regional tensions over oil management and the continued involvement of the North, South, and Maysan Oil Companies in the industry.

As Iraq considers how to set up a new oil company amid myriad legal and policy challenges, it should also pay special attention to the hard lessons learned about government accountability in resource-rich nations like Peru and Nigeria, where poor resource management and public distrust have had steep costs not only for public prosperity, but in violence and the loss of life. 

A transparent national company that has established public trust through sound disclosure and budget practices could enhance citizen participation in the management of the nation’s most important assets.  Iraqi officials have acknowledged the importance of transparency in the country’s recovering oil sector by committing to implement the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative; the National Oil Company can become a powerful vehicle for this public accountability agenda.

LEARN MORE

MEDIA FEED

U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits - The New York Times

Australia Gas Deal Renews Tension - Financial Times

Charged With Fraud, Nigeria's Ruling Party Leader Resigns - Reuters

Western Senators Propose Ban on Pacific Drilling - The New York Times

To Limit Corruption around Mining in Africa, Follow the Money - The Globe and Mail

Court Backs Oil Project - The New York Times

Transparency Increases, But There Is Still a Long Way to Go - The Phnom Penh Post

IMF Develops Project to Help Africa Deal with Illicit Trade - African Manager

Three-day Conference on Africa's Natural Resources Starts in Tanzania - Standard Times Press

After Oil Rig Blast, BP Refused to Share Underwater Spill Footage - ABC News

Finger-Pointing, but Few Answers at Hearings on Drilling - The New York Times

Complaints Over U.N. Prize Sponsored by Equatorial Guinea's Obiang - Reuters

Guide: Community-Company Grievance Resolution for Australian Mining Industry - Oxfam Australia (pdf)

Cote D'Ivoire: President for Life, and Then Some - The New York Times

In Midst of Massive Spill, Oil Industry Fighting Transparency and Accountability - Oxfam America

Leaked Oil Contracts in DRC Threaten Resource Wars and $10 Billion Rip-Off by British Company - Carbon Web

 

NEWS & INFORMATION ARCHIVES

2006, 2005

PUBLICATIONS

Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries
Contract transparency is sorely needed to improve the management of natural resource wealth. In a new report from RWI, authors Peter Rosenblum and Susan Maples delve into government and private sector objections to contract disclosure and make conclusions about what information may legitimately and reasonably be kept confidential, and how civil society institutions can better confront the challenge of secret deals.
Learn more about the report ...

NEW TRANSLATION: Revenue Redistribution at the Local Level
Many resource-rich countries are attempting to compensate their producing regions through shares of resource revenues to be spent at the local level. In "Extractive Industries Revenues Distribution at the Sub-National Level," development economics consultant Matteo Morgandi presents a comparative analysis of international legislation for distribution of extractive revenues from across all levels of government. Prepared at the request of the Peruvian National Congress, the report studies the legislative practices of seven resource-rich countries to identify potential and address challenges. Please note that this report is now also available in Vietnamese.
Learn more ...